Obama to Seek New Assault Weapons Ban

protect the 2nd amendment....

Moderators: Todd, MJW

Obama to Seek New Assault Weapons Ban

Postby Todd » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:44 pm

Obama to Seek New Assault Weapons Ban

The Ban Expired in 2004 During the Bush Administration.
By JASON RYAN

WASHINGTON, Feb. 25, 2009

The Obama administration will seek to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 during the Bush administration, Attorney General Eric Holder said today.

"As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons," Holder told reporters.

Holder said that putting the ban back in place would not only be a positive move by the United States, it would help cut down on the flow of guns going across the border into Mexico, which is struggling with heavy violence among drug cartels along the border.

"I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum." Holder said at a news conference on the arrest of more than 700 people in a drug enforcement crackdown on Mexican drug cartels operating in the U.S.

Mexican government officials have complained that the availability of sophisticated guns from the United States have emboldened drug traffickers to fight over access routes into the U.S.

A State Department travel warning issued Feb. 20, 2009, reflected government concerns about the violence.

"Some recent Mexican army and police confrontations with drug cartels have resembled small-unit combat, with cartels employing automatic weapons and grenades," the warning said. "Large firefights have taken place in many towns and cities across Mexico, but most recently in northern Mexico, including Tijuana, Chihuahua City and Ciudad Juarez."

At the news conference today, Holder described his discussions with his Mexican counterpart about the recent spike in violence.

"I met yesterday with Attorney General Medina Mora of Mexico, and we discussed the unprecedented levels of violence his country is facing because of their enforcement efforts," he said.

Holder declined to offer any time frame for the reimplementation of the assault weapons ban, however.

"It's something, as I said, that the president talked about during the campaign," he said. "There are obviously a number of things that are -- that have been taking up a substantial amount of his time, and so, I'm not sure exactly what the sequencing will be."

In a brief interview with ABC News, Wayne LaPierre, president of the National Rifle Association, said, "I think there are a lot of Democrats on Capitol Hill cringing at Eric Holder's comments right now."

During his confirmation hearing, Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee about other gun control measures the Obama administration may consider.

"I think closing the gun show loophole, the banning of cop-killer bullets and I also think that making the assault weapons ban permanent, would be something that would be permitted under Heller," Holder said, referring to the Supreme Court ruling in Washington, D.C. v. Heller, which asserted the Second Amendment as an individual's right to own a weapon.

The Assault Weapons Ban signed into law by President Clinton in 1994 banned 19 types of semi-automatic military-style guns and ammunition clips with more than 10 rounds.

"A semi-automatic is a quintessential self-defense firearm owned by American citizens in this country," LaPierre said. "I think it is clearly covered under Heller and it's clearly, I think, protected by the Constitution."

Source: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=6960824
---------------------------
"Nothing is easier than spending public money. It does not appear to belong to anybody. The temptation is overwhelming to bestow it on somebody." Calvin Coolidge
Todd
Guide
 
Posts: 14434
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Tennessee

Postby 41mag » Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:04 pm

Most "assault" weapons have zero sporting value and maybe high ego value. If gun owners were truly more responsible, such restrictions would not be needed but such is not the case. Just like some drunk driver have to be locked up to stop their carnage, some types of weapons should be "restricted too. Yet there will always be those that panic and cry foul when they should not because it is the irresponsible actions of some that can result in the loss of guns to all if a leash is not put on them somehow. Many fail to see this though and only live for the moment.
41mag
 

Postby Todd » Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:08 pm

41mag wrote:Most "assault" weapons have zero sporting value and maybe high ego value.


Maybe you our your savior Osama can point out, where within the Constitution of the United States, it says "A well regulated Militia can only own guns with sporting value".


What it actually says is

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Of course, being Democrats, neither you or your traitor for a leader care about this country. You only care about lining the pockets of yourself and welfare rats around the world.....
---------------------------
"Nothing is easier than spending public money. It does not appear to belong to anybody. The temptation is overwhelming to bestow it on somebody." Calvin Coolidge
Todd
Guide
 
Posts: 14434
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Tennessee

Postby Todd » Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:14 pm

P.S. You don't have to look any further than the cesspool of Illinois to see that gun laws do NOT work. They have some of the most stringent gun laws in the nation, and the highest crime rates in the nation to match....

Oh.... and the highest welfare rates in the nation.

Boy that Osama sure has done wonders for Illinois....


:roll:
---------------------------
"Nothing is easier than spending public money. It does not appear to belong to anybody. The temptation is overwhelming to bestow it on somebody." Calvin Coolidge
Todd
Guide
 
Posts: 14434
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Tennessee

Postby bryan » Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:15 pm

Why don't they put a ban on booze. It has killed just as many people, hasn't it?
bryan
Trophy Hunter
 
Posts: 871
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 12:00 am
Location: Cookeville


Return to 2nd Amendment



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron